Client Stories

Specific desks, specific tariffs, specific decisions — not star ratings.

“They recalculated my RTX 4070 run against my Jongno apartment tariff and showed the pool fee was eating more than I thought. I dialed back the night schedule.”
— Min-jun K., Mining Profitability Review

“The electricity sheet alone was worth the session. I still mine, but only when the off-peak window actually covers the difficulty jump. I wish I had brought cleaner meter logs — the first draft needed a second pass.”
— Hye-jin P., Electricity Cost Audit + Review

“I had three different wattage numbers floating around from vendor pages. The hardware profile forced me to measure at the wall. Later reviews finally matched what the bill showed.”
— Sora L., Hardware Profile Setup

Case note: dual-card desk near Gwanghwamun

A day trader ran a 3060 and a 4060 Ti after the US cash open. Credits looked fine on the pool dashboard; the apartment bill did not. During the Profitability Review we rebuilt the model with progressive brackets and a realistic 5.5-hour nightly window. The dual-card schedule only cleared costs on two coins the client already traded around — other algorithms were ornamental. They kept one card on a tighter window and parked the second for seasonal difficulty dips.

Reservation: the client waited two weeks for cleaner smart-plug data, so the first deliverable used manufacturer watts with a confidence note. The revised sheet, after measurements, shifted break-even by several days.

Case note: single laptop-dock GPU in Mapo

A newer trader asked whether an external GPU enclosure was worth hashing overnight. The Electricity Cost Audit showed the enclosure’s idle draw was already material. Combined with pool fees, the optimistic case barely covered power in winter when heaters shared the circuit. They declined the overnight plan and booked a lighter Hardware Profile for a future desktop build instead.